<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.math Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math</link>
  <description>Mathematical discussions and pursuits.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: WHY SCIENCE IS NOT PART OF CULTURE</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a1fe63da521e11ca/de387002a9529c7b?show_docid=de387002a9529c7b</link>
  <description>
  Science is about analysis and rational thought, its about the objective &lt;br&gt; critical understandings of the world, the biggest and the smallest part. &lt;br&gt; Culture is about control, directed emotions, beliefs, shared responses. &lt;br&gt; The thoughtful in a sea of superficial volatile emotions, is a woose, &lt;br&gt; a geek, if he&#39;s lucky, or a gay, if he&#39;s not. Thought seen in terms the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a1fe63da521e11ca/de387002a9529c7b?show_docid=de387002a9529c7b</guid>
  <author>
  t...@home.com
  (TruthSlave)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:59:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: eigenvalues of a matrix</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/592d57c03e983572/c6b55f3dc948d019?show_docid=c6b55f3dc948d019</link>
  <description>
  Thank you.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/592d57c03e983572/c6b55f3dc948d019?show_docid=c6b55f3dc948d019</guid>
  <author>
  leonid...@gmail.com
  (leox)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:52:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Is there some methods to solve equations with MIN operation?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/51f93c35bab4cbcf/4c44d39b5474eaa6?show_docid=4c44d39b5474eaa6</link>
  <description>
  Both x-vectors are solutions of the LP problem since &lt;br&gt; they satisfy the constraints and minimize the objective &lt;br&gt; function. &lt;br&gt; The fact that the first solution gives a solution &lt;br&gt; to the min-problem and the second does not &lt;br&gt; shows that LP-formulation and min-problem are not &lt;br&gt; equivalent. &lt;br&gt; Best wishes &lt;br&gt; Torsten.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/51f93c35bab4cbcf/4c44d39b5474eaa6?show_docid=4c44d39b5474eaa6</guid>
  <author>
  torsten.hen...@umsicht.fhg.de
  (Torsten Hennig)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:39:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Attraction of opposite electric charges would form neutronium</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/3f2f6d8a87149fc4/414c58a72ebc1406?show_docid=414c58a72ebc1406</link>
  <description>
  It is not proof.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/3f2f6d8a87149fc4/414c58a72ebc1406?show_docid=414c58a72ebc1406</guid>
  <author>
  pur...@colorme.com
  (purple)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:25:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/9c5d18db05109992?show_docid=9c5d18db05109992</link>
  <description>
  [...] &lt;br&gt; I don&#39;t know how likely it would be for two seeds to produce &lt;br&gt; overlap in a short time. But I like using seeds that I&#39;ve &lt;br&gt; almost surely never used before. I happen to use &lt;br&gt; the Mersenne Twister algorithm, but getting new &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;random&amp;quot; seeds is always good for any algorithm. &lt;br&gt; [...] &lt;br&gt; I often want to do just that: use new seeds. I used to go to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/9c5d18db05109992?show_docid=9c5d18db05109992</guid>
  <author>
  david...@videotron.ca
  (David Bernier)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:16:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>GHD Limited Edition IV Pure Styler</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8f32fdc323da4f5b/2fd6ae39e887a59b?show_docid=2fd6ae39e887a59b</link>
  <description>
  Been gone for a minute but I’m still going strong with this long &lt;br&gt; transition to natural hair. I’ve straightened my hair three times &lt;br&gt; since the Straight Hair, Fresh Cut post in January. But now I’m ready &lt;br&gt; to get back to less heat until September. I’m probably going to &lt;br&gt; cornrow it up for a few weeks and wear wigs and twists until I find
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8f32fdc323da4f5b/2fd6ae39e887a59b?show_docid=2fd6ae39e887a59b</guid>
  <author>
  xse...@gmail.com
  (lizhou zhu)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:12:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/6aa090c89114e983?show_docid=6aa090c89114e983</link>
  <description>
  Ron asks an interesting question, and I think you shoot from the hip and &lt;br&gt; may have missed on this one. &lt;br&gt; First of all, when crossposted to clc and sci.math, there is no &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot; that does not require disambiquity. Given what it is, we &lt;br&gt; might say &amp;quot;the C standard&amp;quot; when talking about C, or its lurking uncle,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/6aa090c89114e983?show_docid=6aa090c89114e983</guid>
  <author>
  merrilljen...@q.com
  (Uno)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:58:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Is there some methods to solve equations with MIN operation?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/51f93c35bab4cbcf/b5a29118c69db160?show_docid=b5a29118c69db160</link>
  <description>
  I cannot get this answer. Although I am trying to find more &lt;br&gt; information, I am new to LP and Matlab. The following is my code &lt;br&gt; f = [1;1;1;1;0;0] &lt;br&gt; A = [ 0 -1 0 0 0 0 &lt;br&gt; 0 0 0 0 -1 0 &lt;br&gt; 0 0 0 0 0 -1]; &lt;br&gt; b = [-3;-5;-5]; &lt;br&gt; Aeq = [ -1 -1 0 0 1 0 &lt;br&gt; 0 0 -1 -1 0 1]; &lt;br&gt; Beq = [0;0] &lt;br&gt; lb = zeros(6,1) &lt;br&gt; [x, fval, exitflag, output, lambda] = linprog(f,A,b,Aeq,Beq,lb);
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/51f93c35bab4cbcf/b5a29118c69db160?show_docid=b5a29118c69db160</guid>
  <author>
  wangxu.n...@gmail.com
  (Xu Wang)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:44:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Quantiative Science Before Galileo</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/218e6ac8a82edbe8/dbf24802da58235c?show_docid=dbf24802da58235c</link>
  <description>
  Well not really. maths and observation are usually enough.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/218e6ac8a82edbe8/dbf24802da58235c?show_docid=dbf24802da58235c</guid>
  <author>
  chazwy...@yahoo.com
  (Chazwin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:35:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/d6956f1c51607e17?show_docid=d6956f1c51607e17</link>
  <description>
  First of all, I think we&#39;re talking to the actual George Marsaglia here. &lt;br&gt; Thank you so much for posting. You may have displaced Terence as our &lt;br&gt; senior member. &lt;br&gt; Are you creating bigger numbers just to accomodate your age?:-) &lt;br&gt; $ gcc -Wall -Wextra geo1.c -o out &lt;br&gt; geo1.c: In function ‘MWC’: &lt;br&gt; geo1.c:5: warning: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘c’
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/d6956f1c51607e17?show_docid=d6956f1c51607e17</guid>
  <author>
  merrilljen...@q.com
  (Uno)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:33:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/fa49b969c0638207?show_docid=fa49b969c0638207</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;ron-shepard-969C9C.2213062907 2...@news60.forteinc.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; No, no, a thousand times, NO! That is NOT enough, though FAR too many &lt;br&gt; Web pages, published papers and books claim that it is. Disjointness &lt;br&gt; isn&#39;t even a poor relation of randomness. &lt;br&gt; This is easiest to see with a simple multiplicative congruential
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/fa49b969c0638207?show_docid=fa49b969c0638207</guid>
  <author>
  n...@cam.ac.uk
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:41:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/59451b03a7d4a370?show_docid=59451b03a7d4a370</link>
  <description>
  Ah, of course.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/59451b03a7d4a370?show_docid=59451b03a7d4a370</guid>
  <author>
  g.bo...@auckland.no.spam.ac.nz
  (Gib Bogle)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:39:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/557aaa3f4c16d1ea?show_docid=557aaa3f4c16d1ea</link>
  <description>
  (snip) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;That is true, but there are some assumptions. Since the &lt;br&gt; standard doesn&#39;t say much at all about the underlying algorithm, &lt;br&gt; it isn&#39;t so reliable a statement as it seems. &lt;br&gt; For one, many PRNGs have poor performance with some starting seeds, &lt;br&gt; or poor performance for some cycles, especially as viewed from
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/557aaa3f4c16d1ea?show_docid=557aaa3f4c16d1ea</guid>
  <author>
  g...@ugcs.caltech.edu
  (glen herrmannsfeldt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:37:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/036f5c4ae78d3761?show_docid=036f5c4ae78d3761</link>
  <description>
  (snip) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; 1 &lt;br&gt; You can subtract 2**32, or find two values to IOR together. &lt;br&gt; (And remember that this is all twos-complement specific.) &lt;br&gt; -- glen
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ea40acba15d5d078/036f5c4ae78d3761?show_docid=036f5c4ae78d3761</guid>
  <author>
  g...@ugcs.caltech.edu
  (glen herrmannsfeldt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:28:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>square = inside circle + pseudocircle, and, cube = inside sphere + pseudosphere #4.31 &amp; #246 Correcting Math &amp; Atom Totality</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/cacbf47da0580183/2383c6cee7036ffb?show_docid=2383c6cee7036ffb</link>
  <description>
  Looks like I invented some new terms here of: &lt;br&gt; (a) ReCalculus to signify the strip-building rather than the &lt;br&gt; decomposition into picket-fences &lt;br&gt; of Calculus. &lt;br&gt; (b) Pseudocircle to signify the name of the object formed from the &lt;br&gt; circle inside a square &lt;br&gt; and which is put together as a 4 pointed star shape. &lt;br&gt; But an interesting question is whether the 2D pseudocircle is related
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.dm/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/cacbf47da0580183/2383c6cee7036ffb?show_docid=2383c6cee7036ffb</guid>
  <author>
  plutonium.archime...@gmail.com
  (Archimedes Plutonium)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:44:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
