Where_Was_George wrote: > McCain/Palin seem to be claiming that they're running as Progressives. > McCain's Right Wing minions though, preach that women belong at home.
> Palin her ownself is a tongues-talking Evangelical who intends to > impose Creationism on everyone else's children.
> Perhaps that's why she lets McCain do all the talking, seeing how he's > the man in the partnership and all.
> How will she react on the world stage when some world leader goes > eyeball-to-eyeball with her?
> Will she start crying, or will McCain have to drop what he's doing to > take up the slack to keep her from embarrassing the country?
> Worse yet, will world leaders avoid serious discussion with her to > avoid being denounced as bullies?
> Pundits have already suggested that Joe Biden risks that very same > accusation during the VP debates.
> He'll probably have to restrict himself to debating which brand of > chocolate makes the best chocolate chip cookies.
> And if she's so "progressive", why is she letting Rupert Murdoch and > Ward Connerly take away women's civil rights under the guise of making > women equal?
> Would Palin have supported the Equal Rights Amendment and does she > support Title IX?
As we suspected, Palin has all the substance of a two-week-old McCain diaper!
She apparently is incapable of inculcating information fed to her by McCain's "handlers" -- she stumbles and speaks childlike in circles around the simplest questions.
Did NOT know what the so-called Bush Doctrine means. (Seemed not to have heard of it.)
Felt we should be able to cross Pakistan's borders chasing "terrorists" without Pakistan's approval.
Said we should not discourage Israel from bombing Iran.
She seemed to hint we should consider attacking Russia if they got out of line, like in Georgia, which she erroneously stated did not start the recent hostilities.
Did not come clean about WHY her son is going to a war zone, i.e., the long-time doper was given the choice of joining up or doing time.
A total religious NUT, she tried to couch (change) her "Iraq as God's work" statement in words she ascribed to Lincoln -- information obviously provided by the campaign people.
Anyone who (like blew here) believes this appalling jerk belongs in ANY position of responsibility or leadership, including governor of Alaska, is obviously as much a low-life fool as she is.
BUT I SAY -- COME ON BACK FOR MORE, SARAH! SHOW THE PEOPLE WHAT AND WHO YOU ARE!
In three weeks or less the bloom will be off Palin's rose, and all those old, racist, fat, hot-flashy bags who think she's Hillary's second coming will be dragging their saggy asses back to reality and their Democratic Party!
> It sounds like the planned inquisition didn't go as planned.
><he he he>
Considering the quality of the new slurs I'd say they've seen thier event horizon and are falling slowly to thier death. Expect the slurs to get even more vile and repugnant, shallow and factless as time goes on.
>> It sounds like the planned inquisition didn't go as planned.
>> <he he he>
> It didn't Charlie Gibson tried his usual techniques and failed again.
It makes me laugh to think that Gibson had a golden opportunity handed to him: introducing Sarah Palin to America. But no, he couldn't rise to it. My wife was infuriated by his "why should we vote for you little lady" attitude.
>>> It sounds like the planned inquisition didn't go as planned.
>>> <he he he>
>> It didn't Charlie Gibson tried his usual techniques and failed again.
> It makes me laugh to think that Gibson had a golden opportunity > handed to him: introducing Sarah Palin to America. But no, he > couldn't rise to it. My wife was infuriated by his "why should we > vote for you little lady" attitude.
|
